##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

P. Thomas

Abstract

Decisions on health spending depend ultimately on the valuation of human life in the country concerned. Previous attempts in the UK have been linked to the one-size-fits-all “value of a prevented fatality” (VPF), now shown to be based on a fundamentally flawed method. An objective and validated alternative is available in the J-value (J for “judgment”), which addresses the improved life expectancy a treatment offers. The J-value sheds important light on what Man chooses to spend on life-extending measures, allowing lessons to be drawn for the desirable relationship between GDP and spending on health.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Articles